FloodGrapher 2 Jar?

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:FloodGrapher
← Thread:Talk:FloodGrapher/FloodGrapher 2 Jar?/reply

Jump to navigation Jump to search

These days with 'adaptive profile' movements, flattening is less of an issue. FloodGrapher was more used for random movements. I could see it still being useful for tuning top Micro bots.

If you want to improve a wavesurfing movement, something that adapts its movement profile based on bullet hits (and possibly location visits), I would tune against RaikoMicro.

Skilgannon (talk)‎

Hrm are there any modern movement challenge bots? The ones in the latest movement challenge are from 2007! :o It would be nice to tune my movement in a controlled environment against modern bots. Or is the MC2K7 still a useful test?

Wolfman (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I'd just use real battles and improve my score vs a test bed of like 100 bots. I use [[BedMaker]], which I think needs updating to communicate with LiteRumble. I also posted some for Tkiesel a while ago over on [[User talk:Tkiesel]], if those are of use to you.

But MC2k7 should still be useful if you prefer that kind of thing.

Return to Thread:Talk:FloodGrapher/FloodGrapher 2 Jar?/reply (3).

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:FloodGrapher/FloodGrapher_2_Jar%3F/reply#FloodGrapher_2_Jar.3F_4745"