Why init instead of static

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Revision as of 18 September 2011 at 23:34.
The highlighted comment was created in this revision.

Why init instead of static

Chase, I believe the reason to use the init method instead of a static block within this class is that the static block won't be called until this class is loaded by the JVM the first time it's used. By using an init method and calling it from a static block in your bot class, you ensure it's called when your bot is loaded, before the battle starts and not causing any skipped turns. Hopefully somebody can confirm/deny that.

    Voidious15:25, 18 September 2011

    Voidious, you right in common, but there're an issue - robots are loaded in theirs threads, so you can skip turns any way.

      Jdev15:33, 18 September 2011
       

      IIRC, while there is a limit on the time for a robot's class to load, it is far greater than the time allowed per turn.

        Rednaxela16:05, 18 September 2011
         

        If I recall, the static blocks are called when the class is loaded (in order they are in the source code).

        I forget if it is loaded at the same time or on first reference. I think in robocode all class files are loaded at load time. Which means it doesn't matter where it is initialized in this case.

          Chase-san01:34, 19 September 2011