Difference between revisions of "Thread:User talk:Sheldor/Are the robots we create alive?/reply (78)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Reply to Are the robots we create alive?) |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 02:59, 28 February 2013
If we use negentropy to define life, by definition, if it fulfils negentropy, it is organic. (according to Google's dictionary anyways, Merriam Webster suggests some other definitions, but I think they would come to the same thing)
So though I don't don't necessarily accept the negentropy criteria as a satisfactory definition, but for the time being, I'll work with it.
As regards the last two points, remember, I never saw the movie.
Could you explain how the machines being on their own is significant?
What I'm saying is that you can't arrange a bunch of rocks in such a way that they are sentient. Movies can be made where vegetables can talk, but that doesn't mean it can really happen.