Difference between revisions of "User talk:BenHorner"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(MouseEvent and old wiki questions...)
(Updated MouseEvent question)
Line 1: Line 1:
I see that in the robocode javadocs for the MouseEvent [[http://robocode.sourceforge.net/docs/robocode/]]; the MouseEvent class has only one method, getSourceEvent() which returns a java.awt.event.MouseEvent, which in turn contains the interesting info about the MouseEvent, but the javadocs say "Do not call this method!"...  Is that really a dangerous thing to do?  I think it might be useful for testing and stuff...  --[[User:BenHorner|BenHorner]] 00:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
+
I see that in the robocode javadocs for the MouseEvent http://robocode.sourceforge.net/docs/robocode/; the MouseEvent class has only one method, getSourceEvent() which returns a java.awt.event.MouseEvent, which in turn contains the interesting info about the MouseEvent, but the javadocs say "Do not call this method!"...  Is that really a dangerous thing to do?  I think it might be useful for testing and stuff...  --[[User:BenHorner|BenHorner]] 00:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
: Looks like I might have been a little confused, all of the onMouseXXX() methods are taking java.awt.event.MouseEvent, is robocode.MouseEvent used anywhere?  Maybe just vestigial...? --[[User:BenHorner|BenHorner]] 00:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)
  
 
----
 
----

Revision as of 02:54, 11 May 2009

I see that in the robocode javadocs for the MouseEvent http://robocode.sourceforge.net/docs/robocode/; the MouseEvent class has only one method, getSourceEvent() which returns a java.awt.event.MouseEvent, which in turn contains the interesting info about the MouseEvent, but the javadocs say "Do not call this method!"... Is that really a dangerous thing to do? I think it might be useful for testing and stuff... --BenHorner 00:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

Looks like I might have been a little confused, all of the onMouseXXX() methods are taking java.awt.event.MouseEvent, is robocode.MouseEvent used anywhere? Maybe just vestigial...? --BenHorner 00:54, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

The old wiki content is still available, but not so easy to access. Voidious posted a note somewhere about how to access it -- I can copy it over if you like. Talk pages are for comments, yes. You should also sign your posts, on this wiki you just need to put in four tildes (~~~~) and it'll add your name + timestamp. The rumble is definitely running but on a new server. See RoboRumble and Darkcanuck/RRServer for details. I also put a copy of most older bots on my webserver since the repository wasn't behaving: http://darkcanuck.net/rumble/robots --Darkcanuck 04:03, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

If you want to know basic of this new wiki, look at {{Welcome}}. It contain basic information about using this wiki. » Nat | Talk » 10:38, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the info and the link(s). --BenHorner 21:52, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
I wouldn't mind having that link to the old wiki, or to the page that describes how to get there. I'm sure I put some stuff on there that I'd like to reread now. --BenHorner 00:42, 11 May 2009 (UTC)