Difference between revisions of "User talk:JohnCleland"
(comment) |
JohnCleland (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
—— [[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 13:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | —— [[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 13:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
|} | |} | ||
| Line 17: | Line 5: | ||
Yeah, welcome back. Good luck shaking up Nano-land again. =) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 17:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | Yeah, welcome back. Good luck shaking up Nano-land again. =) --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 17:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Heh, not really back, too many other things to do at the moment. And I'm not sure (short of everyone randomizing theur bot names) that LBB can be topped. Also even with its strength, the margins at the top of Nano are pretty tight, so not sure how much more can be squeezed out of a nano. | ||
| + | It will, I think, take a revolutionary idea to surpass any of the current top bots, and my previous " revolutionary ideas" proved laugahable and never made it into production, or like the PRAL and SRAL bots sub-par and not really all that original. I hate to have admit that my successful bots were very derivative. | ||
| + | I never did have the time or dedication to get very far up the Micro ranks, let alone mini or mega, but it is still fun to peruse the cool ideas and clever coding you guys come up with. And fun to try the occasional idea in code to see whether it will fly. | ||
| + | I hope to make it back to the arena at some stage, until then, happy dueling :) | ||
| + | --[[User:JohnCleland|JohnCleland]] 22:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:56, 24 October 2009
—— Nat Pavasant 13:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC) |}
Welcomeback! Never thought you would come back really =) Hope you will take your throne back. And I think you might want to read this and this before starting your next project you mentioned on User_talk:Miked0801! --Nat Pavasant 13:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, welcome back. Good luck shaking up Nano-land again. =) --Voidious 17:46, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
Heh, not really back, too many other things to do at the moment. And I'm not sure (short of everyone randomizing theur bot names) that LBB can be topped. Also even with its strength, the margins at the top of Nano are pretty tight, so not sure how much more can be squeezed out of a nano. It will, I think, take a revolutionary idea to surpass any of the current top bots, and my previous " revolutionary ideas" proved laugahable and never made it into production, or like the PRAL and SRAL bots sub-par and not really all that original. I hate to have admit that my successful bots were very derivative. I never did have the time or dedication to get very far up the Micro ranks, let alone mini or mega, but it is still fun to peruse the cool ideas and clever coding you guys come up with. And fun to try the occasional idea in code to see whether it will fly. I hope to make it back to the arena at some stage, until then, happy dueling :) --JohnCleland 22:56, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
