Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

 

Return to Thread:Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/Non-Iterative/Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope.

I had always thought of this as a way of using guess factors in twin duel or team battles. The advantage it has over PIF and Displacement Vectors is that those two can actually go out of MEA in some cases. I have also been working on a mathematical formula but you know me, trigonometry is not my area of expertise =)

Dsekercioglu (talk)‎13:38, 7 August 2019

Now you know the shape of escape envelope, apart from removing predicted locations outside walls, you can also remove those out side of escape circle. The intersection of the area of the escape circle and the battlefield is essentially escape area.

Xor (talk)‎08:57, 8 August 2019
 

Thanks for posting this, Xor! The graphic is especially informative.

Enamel 32 (talk)‎02:37, 8 August 2019
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Maximum_Escape_Angle/Precise_Positional/Non-Iterative/Old_discussion_on_the_shape_of_escape_envelope#Old_discussion_on_the_shape_of_escape_envelope_6635"