Thread history
Viewing a history listing
| Time | User | Activity | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| 09:06, 25 July 2015 | Wolfman (talk | contribs) | New thread created | |
| 16:41, 25 July 2015 | Skilgannon (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to FloodGrapher 2 Jar?) |
| 17:54, 25 July 2015 | Wolfman (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to FloodGrapher 2 Jar?) |
| 19:07, 25 July 2015 | Voidious (talk | contribs) | New reply created | (Reply to FloodGrapher 2 Jar?) |
Robocode Repository appears to be down, does anyone have the jar file for FG2 I can grab from somewhere else please? Is flattening your movement profile still as important as it used to be? I wanted to analyse Agent Smith's movement to see how it holds up and hopefully flatten a little. Thanks!
These days with 'adaptive profile' movements, flattening is less of an issue. FloodGrapher was more used for random movements. I could see it still being useful for tuning top Micro bots.
If you want to improve a wavesurfing movement, something that adapts its movement profile based on bullet hits (and possibly location visits), I would tune against RaikoMicro.
Hrm are there any modern movement challenge bots? The ones in the latest movement challenge are from 2007! :o It would be nice to tune my movement in a controlled environment against modern bots. Or is the MC2K7 still a useful test?
I'd just use real battles and improve my score vs a test bed of like 100 bots. I use BedMaker, which I think needs updating to communicate with LiteRumble. I also posted some for Tkiesel a while ago over on User talk:Tkiesel, if those are of use to you.
But MC2k7 should still be useful if you prefer that kind of thing.
