Thread history

From Talk:Gilgalad
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
23:43, 27 August 2014 AW (talk | contribs) New thread created  
02:06, 28 August 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
16:13, 29 August 2014 Gralth (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
16:16, 29 August 2014 Gralth (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
16:29, 31 August 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
00:24, 4 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
00:25, 4 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (typo)
14:16, 4 September 2014 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
16:24, 4 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
18:18, 4 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
08:19, 5 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
10:27, 5 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (or not?)
11:36, 5 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
13:41, 5 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
13:44, 5 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (typo)
00:50, 6 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (update)
02:27, 6 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (new info)
03:55, 6 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
17:37, 6 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
17:38, 6 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
17:48, 6 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (fotmatting)
23:22, 7 September 2014 FlemmingLarsen (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
00:29, 8 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
19:03, 8 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
20:19, 8 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
21:01, 8 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
21:40, 8 September 2014 FlemmingLarsen (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
22:50, 8 September 2014 FlemmingLarsen (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
21:45, 12 September 2014 FlemmingLarsen (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
01:03, 13 September 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
10:15, 15 September 2014 FlemmingLarsen (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
13:51, 15 September 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)
20:13, 15 September 2014 FlemmingLarsen (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to Minibot?)

Does anyone know why Gilgalad, and many other megabots are now listed under minibots in the rankings page?

AW (talk)23:43, 27 August 2014

We discussed it about a month ago and agreement was that this it the bug in 1.9 robocode. I think we still have not reported it to developers.

I also noticed that the new robocode seems to run multi threaded (at least in 1.9.2). In my opinion this is not a welcome change, since it eats all available cores of my CPU. I used to run rumble, melerumble, and top 30 melee on my machine, but now they fight between each other and consume more than I want to spare for robocode.

Beaming (talk)02:06, 28 August 2014

There are a couple different uploaders presently. When some of them upload, it appears the codesize isn't respected. As soon as a couple others do, the big bots get pruned.

Gralth (talk)16:13, 29 August 2014
 

There are a couple different uploaders presently. When some of them upload, it appears the codesize isn't respected. As soon as a couple others do, the big bots get pruned.

Gralth (talk)16:16, 29 August 2014

Well, I think my uploaders use to be (and probably still are) culprits. But I did not do any tweaking or modification of stock client. I was also under suspicion that even with mine, some of my machines were doing the correct size report and other were not. But they all have identical configs and java distributions.

The only thing which might be of importance: I run everything on OpenJDK, may be it has a different way to evaluate the code size.

Nevertheless, I stopped uploading for a week, so new wrong entries are due to new uploaders. May be we should look for correlation, and see what is the possible reason for the size misreporting.

Beaming (talk)16:29, 31 August 2014

Hi all. Apparently all we need to do is to report bugs to developers :) I did so and Fnl fixed it within a day.

I suggest everyone to upgrade to 1.9.2.2 and kindly ask Rednaxela to tune rumble server to accept client with this version and above.

Beaming (talk)00:24, 4 September 2014

It would be Skilgannon that runs the rumble server, not I. ;)

Rednaxela (talk)14:16, 4 September 2014