Difference between revisions of "Targeting Matrix"
m |
m (move to category=Targeting Discussions) |
||
(4 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Example == | == Example == | ||
− | Consider we wanted to simply devise a matrix that would map distance to a firing angle. In order to do this, we might create an 3-dimensional matrix, with values [x^2, x, 1] for every x that we record, where x is the distance to our target at the time of firing, and a second vector, [y] where y is the correct firing angle. After acquiring three data points, we'll be able to arrange our vectors in the form Ax=b, as such: | + | Consider we wanted to simply devise a matrix that would map distance to a firing angle. In order to do this, we might create an 3-dimensional matrix, with values <code>A = [x^2, x, 1]</code> for every x that we record, where x is the distance to our target at the time of firing, and a second vector, <code>b = [y]</code> where y is the correct firing angle. After acquiring three data points, we'll be able to arrange our vectors in the form Ax=b, as such: |
<code>A = [[a^2, a, 1], [b^2, b, 1], [c^2, c, 1]] | <code>A = [[a^2, a, 1], [b^2, b, 1], [c^2, c, 1]] | ||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
b = [[angle_a], [angle_b], [angle_c]]</code> | b = [[angle_a], [angle_b], [angle_c]]</code> | ||
− | Now we wish to solve for x. To do this, we project A onto b. Therefore, we first multiply both sides of the equation by <math>A^T</math> to get: | + | Now we wish to solve for '''x'''. To do this, we project A onto '''b'''. Therefore, we first multiply both sides of the equation by <math>A^T</math> to get: |
<math>A^T * A * x = A^T * b</math> | <math>A^T * A * x = A^T * b</math> | ||
− | And then multiply by the inverse of <math>(A^T * A)</math> to reach <math>x = (A^T * A)^{-1} * A^T * b</math>. We now can compute x. | + | And then multiply by the inverse of <math>(A^T * A)</math> to reach <math>x = (A^T * A)^{-1} * A^T * b</math>. We now can compute '''x'''. |
− | + | With '''x''', it is possible to map distances to targets to firing angles, via simply inputing distance into the function: | |
<math>f(x) = unknown_1 * x^2 + unknown_2 * x + unknown_3 * 1 = angle</math> | <math>f(x) = unknown_1 * x^2 + unknown_2 * x + unknown_3 * 1 = angle</math> | ||
− | Notice that | + | Notice that the projection matrix, <math>(A^T * A)^{-1} * A^T</math>, was used to compute '''x''' rather than simply <math>A^{-1}</math>. This is because by using the projection matrix it is possible to compute '''x''' for any number of tuples. This is extremely useful since the alternative is to use a polynomial of dimension <math>n</math> to fit a line through all of the <math>n</math> data points. |
− | This idea is also extremely powerful because it | + | This idea is also extremely powerful because it simplifies segmentation- in order to track another factor one simply appends a vector to A. For example, if one wanted to additionally track target velocity, one would simply append another vector to A, such that: |
<code>A = [[v, a^2, a, 1], [v, b^2, b, 1], [v, c^2, c, 1]]</code> | <code>A = [[v, a^2, a, 1], [v, b^2, b, 1], [v, c^2, c, 1]]</code> | ||
− | where v is the target velocity. (x in this case would also need another element). | + | where v is the target velocity. ('''x''' in this case would also need another element). |
− | [[Category:Targeting]] | + | {{Targeting Navbox}} |
+ | [[Category:Targeting Discussions]] |
Latest revision as of 19:27, 8 September 2011
A technique employing knowledge at the intersection of linear algebra and statistics.
Idea
Using projections, as described in linear algebra, it's possible to map an n-dimensional matrix, A, to a vector, b, via a third vector, x, such that Ax=b.
Example
Consider we wanted to simply devise a matrix that would map distance to a firing angle. In order to do this, we might create an 3-dimensional matrix, with values A = [x^2, x, 1]
for every x that we record, where x is the distance to our target at the time of firing, and a second vector, b = [y]
where y is the correct firing angle. After acquiring three data points, we'll be able to arrange our vectors in the form Ax=b, as such:
A = [[a^2, a, 1], [b^2, b, 1], [c^2, c, 1]]
x = [unknown1, unknown2, unknown3]
b = [[angle_a], [angle_b], [angle_c]]
Now we wish to solve for x. To do this, we project A onto b. Therefore, we first multiply both sides of the equation by <math>A^T</math> to get:
<math>A^T * A * x = A^T * b</math>
And then multiply by the inverse of <math>(A^T * A)</math> to reach <math>x = (A^T * A)^{-1} * A^T * b</math>. We now can compute x.
With x, it is possible to map distances to targets to firing angles, via simply inputing distance into the function:
<math>f(x) = unknown_1 * x^2 + unknown_2 * x + unknown_3 * 1 = angle</math>
Notice that the projection matrix, <math>(A^T * A)^{-1} * A^T</math>, was used to compute x rather than simply <math>A^{-1}</math>. This is because by using the projection matrix it is possible to compute x for any number of tuples. This is extremely useful since the alternative is to use a polynomial of dimension <math>n</math> to fit a line through all of the <math>n</math> data points.
This idea is also extremely powerful because it simplifies segmentation- in order to track another factor one simply appends a vector to A. For example, if one wanted to additionally track target velocity, one would simply append another vector to A, such that:
A = [[v, a^2, a, 1], [v, b^2, b, 1], [v, c^2, c, 1]]
where v is the target velocity. (x in this case would also need another element).
|