Difference between revisions of "User talk:CrazyBassoonist"
(reply) |
(Reply) |
||
| (32 intermediate revisions by 8 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | == RoboRumble == | ||
| + | I finally got my version of RoboRumble working! I've always felt a little bad about uploading bots but not contributing battles, and finally I'll be able to=)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 16:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | ==EliteTournament== | ||
| + | Because doing well in the roborumble often involves crushing bad/old bots by a large percentage instead of beating strong new contenders, I started wondering about how all of the newer robots stack up against each other. So, assuming there's interest, I think I'll start running my own informal tournament weekly (when time permits). I think it's an interesting idea and will be a lot of fun. The rules will be as follows: | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. There will be six categories: Mega, Mini, Micro, Nano, Extends Robot, and Implements Droid. Robots will only fight against other robots in their own category (I.E. Megas won't fight Nanos and Micros won't fight Minis). Each robot will fight every other robot in its category in one 35-round battle on an 800 by 600 field. I realize that only one battle per robot combination won't be the most accurate way to do it, but it would save time and I feel that it is more in the spirit of the tournament idea. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 2. Every user participating in the tournament will be allowed to put a maximum of one robot into each category, for a total of six robots. Users can get points for winning certain segments of the tournament: | ||
| + | * 1 point for Mega APS king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Mega PL king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Mini APS king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Mini PL king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Micro APS king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Micro PL king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Nano APS king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Nano PL king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Extends Robot APS king | ||
| + | * 1 point for Implements Droid APS king | ||
| + | The User with the most overall points will be declared the winner of the tournament. This means that people with a wide variety of robots will tend to do better in this challenge. | ||
| + | |||
| + | 3. You may not add bots that are not your own. This means that inactive bot authors will not be able to add their robots to the EliteTournament. Of course, nothing prevents you from adding your own old(or even ancient!) robots. I simply want robots made by people who still peek at the wiki now and again. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note: I realize that this doesn't contain any melee rankings, but I couldn't think of a simple way to rank the different melee robots. If anyone has a good idea for how I can do this, I will include it in the tournament. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, that's the EliteTournament. Keep in mind that it is a just for fun thing, and the scores from it shouldn't be taken too seriously. This should be an exciting addition to the scores obtained from the RoboRumble though. All you have to do is tell me what robots to run in it, and I'll provide the scores. Thoughts? Comments? Criticism?--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 17:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Seems like a neat idea. I'm not sure an "overall winner" is such a great idea, since so few people have enough bots to cover all the categories, but maybe it would encourage some of us to write some. In general, I definitely like the idea of focusing on beating each other instead of crushing the weak. Though crushing the weak may still work in this format, to a degree. =) I still want to do a bracket tourney of the top of the main RoboRumble, basically run how the [[Twin Duel]] was - round robin to seed a bracket tourney. Not sure if that will happen by month's end... --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 14:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | It sounds interesting. I kind of agree with Voidious regarding the "overall winner" bit, particularly considering the 'droid' and 'robot' categories, but yeah. By the way, any particular reason for APS and PL? Maybe it's just me personally, but I find survival % most interesting these days (I mean, both the "score" system and winner-take-all seem a bit artificial to me). --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 16:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | In such a tournament my poor abuse Seraphim might actually do well (it's good at anti-surfer). — <span style="font-family: monospace">[[User:Chase-san|Chase]]-[[User_talk:Chase-san|san]]</span> 19:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The overall winner thing really doesn't matter that much to me. I only added it as an incentive to the more competitive-minded robocoders and to encourage people to put more types of robots into the tournament; this idea was more about seeing how our robots do when weighed only against other decent ones. As for the APS and PL, I picked the APS because that's what we use in the rumble, and the PL because that encourages the idea of beating the strong instead of crushing the weak. A survival category would probably be an excellent addition, so I might just add that--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 21:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | To clarify: I have no qualms about removing the Overall Winner entirely if its unpopular--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 21:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Help??? == | ||
| + | For some reason, when I save in eclipse it updates the file in the src folder, but not the bin folder. This means that I can create new bots and update the ones I have, but I can't change what's in the bin folder so the robocode robots always stay the same. Does anyone have any idea what to do about this?--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 05:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hi! | ||
| + | I didn't understand your question completely. | ||
| + | Do you mean, that Eclipse did not compile your code when you press ctrl+s? | ||
| + | Try to execute "make" or "build" command (i don't remeber for sure, because i don't use eclipse for 3 years) | ||
| + | --[[User:Jdev|Jdev]] 05:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Eclipse still compiles my code when I press ctrl+s. The problem is that when I save, normally two things happen: eclipse creates a .java file in the src folder, and a .jar or .class(don't remember which) in the bin folder, which is what robocode actually uses. Right now, when I press save, all that happens is that a .java file is created or edited in the src folder, and the bin folder remains unchanged.--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 13:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That means Eclipse doesn't compile your code. Try to make sure that <code>Project > Build automatically</code> is checked. Otherwise you have to build the project yourself (<code>Project > Build all</code>). --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 13:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That fixed it! Thanks a lot:-)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 14:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Mercutio == | ||
| + | I'm about to release yet another micro melee bot: Mercutio. I decided that with all the HOT-dodging movements going on at the top of the rumble, I might try something similar but at a more comfortable codesize level. Mercutio has an Anti-Gravity movement (technically a minimum risk movement with a max distance of 36) that focuses on dodging simple targeting. My tests indicate it should be about top ten in micro melee, and while I haven't tested it much in one-on-one it might be decent as its movement dodges fast targeting really well.--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 15:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Suspicious Scores == | ||
| + | This: http://darkcanuck.net/rumble/BattleDetails?game=minimeleerumble&name=oog.melee.Capulet%200.1&vs=dmsr.MiniR101%200.4--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 23:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I Just added some debug in my [[User_talk:DavidR#Melee_client_problem.3F]] page about the problems with my meleerumble client. --[[User:DavidR|DavidR]] 09:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == A Droid???? == | ||
| + | Some info about CapuletDroid: Its a nano-sized droid based on [[Capulet]]. The only way its movement differs from Capulet's is that its movement does not take perpendicularity into account; it also has a decent targeting/energy management system that uses the angles from bullets that hit it to figure out where to aim. I'm pretty proud of this bot, as it took a lot of squeezing and innovations to get it to work. I doubt if it'll be very competitive, but it should be at least in the top half of the nano melee rankings. I commented the code out, as it seems to me like a pretty good source of [[Droid]]-related information--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 03:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | That's neat! Always fun to see someone exploring new territory. =) Those Melee scores are looking pretty respectable. You going to keep working on it, or just a one-off experiment? I wonder how high it can go... --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 16:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I have same idea=) So may be, sometime, when i finish UltraMarine, i will build rival for CapuletDroid and we will give life for new league=) --[[User:Jdev|Jdev]] 17:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, I do plan to keep working on this (of course, I think this for every robot....) and it would be nice to have another droid to compete against=)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 23:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | There are several Droids out there if you search well enough... --[[User:Nat|<span style="color:#099;">Nat</span>]] [[User talk:Nat|<span style="color:#0a5;">Pavasant</span>]] 13:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Hmm... I looked, but Bvh.hdr.hodur was the only one I could find (in the rumble), and it isn't even in the meleerumble. So some more competition would be nice=)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 02:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | The only one I've played with is Tiresias, by [[User:Kawigi|Kawigi]]. You can find some download links to Droids at [[oldwiki:ImplementsDroidCompetition/Participants]]. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Uh oh == | ||
| + | Haha big problem: I just noticed there are now exactly 666 articles. Notice how this coincides with the kinsens nanobot...... Haha just joking--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 01:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ==Melee scoring== | ||
| + | I have a question... Will releasing my new robot at the same time as a shadow version affect it's score at all? I mean because they'll both be getting run a lot, and having an awesome robot like that in the same battle affects how well it does a ton--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 23:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | No, don't worry, they won't run all their battles together. The client appears to pick one of the bots that needs battles and run a random battle for that one bot. You'll just get battles half as fast as you would if you were the only bot needing battles. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 23:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Ah, well that's good(Sorry ABC). I'm excited about this robot, it scored ahead of GlowBlowMelee consistently against one group of robots =). I'm hoping top ten for it--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Note though, that it could have a slight affect, because that new version of Shadow would be in 3.something% of your battles by chance, and if it's hugely better/worse than the old version it would have a little affect on your score, but... well nothing big. While it's tiny between two increments of a bot, it's theoretically nonzero. A newly introduced bot (particularly something like a second sitting duck...) would likely have a bigger affect than a different version of Shadow, but still probably not big. Intoducing a second sitting duck to rumble is probably the worst-case for how much a single newly introduced bot could affect the rumble. Unless... you count something diabolic like a rambot specifically designed to attack Shadow and nobody else... --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 04:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well I'm quite happy with how it appears to be doing now, no matter how the melee scoring works--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 22:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | == Deep Robocoders == | ||
| + | Haha, I just found this page on the old wiki: http://old.robowiki.net/cgi-bin/robowiki?MultiThreading/Ethics. It was very interesting to see robocoders arguing philosophy:-)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 01:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : If you look at [[oldwiki:ABC]], you will find Robocoder discuss football (soccer) =) » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 02:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
==Repository== | ==Repository== | ||
I'm getting this message when I try to go to the bots page on the repository: | I'm getting this message when I try to go to the bots page on the repository: | ||
| Line 89: | Line 180: | ||
::: From what I had heard, supposedly the owner of RobocodeRepository.com was working on a remake in Ruby on Rails, however no news has been heard in a long time, so that would count as inactive yeah. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 16:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | ::: From what I had heard, supposedly the owner of RobocodeRepository.com was working on a remake in Ruby on Rails, however no news has been heard in a long time, so that would count as inactive yeah. --[[User:Rednaxela|Rednaxela]] 16:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Montague == | ||
| + | I just realized, that you named Mercutio and Capulet from Romeo and Juliet (doh!). To keep up with the Romeo and Juliet theme, I suggest that you name your next bot Montague. Doesn't anyone else agree with me? --[[User:Khanguy|Khanguy]] 23:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | You're right, I also had a nanobot (now retired) named Tybalt. I'll make Montague the name of my next melee bot=)--[[User:CrazyBassoonist|CrazyBassoonist]] 01:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 02:08, 13 April 2011
Contents
RoboRumble
I finally got my version of RoboRumble working! I've always felt a little bad about uploading bots but not contributing battles, and finally I'll be able to=)--CrazyBassoonist 16:59, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
EliteTournament
Because doing well in the roborumble often involves crushing bad/old bots by a large percentage instead of beating strong new contenders, I started wondering about how all of the newer robots stack up against each other. So, assuming there's interest, I think I'll start running my own informal tournament weekly (when time permits). I think it's an interesting idea and will be a lot of fun. The rules will be as follows:
1. There will be six categories: Mega, Mini, Micro, Nano, Extends Robot, and Implements Droid. Robots will only fight against other robots in their own category (I.E. Megas won't fight Nanos and Micros won't fight Minis). Each robot will fight every other robot in its category in one 35-round battle on an 800 by 600 field. I realize that only one battle per robot combination won't be the most accurate way to do it, but it would save time and I feel that it is more in the spirit of the tournament idea.
2. Every user participating in the tournament will be allowed to put a maximum of one robot into each category, for a total of six robots. Users can get points for winning certain segments of the tournament:
- 1 point for Mega APS king
- 1 point for Mega PL king
- 1 point for Mini APS king
- 1 point for Mini PL king
- 1 point for Micro APS king
- 1 point for Micro PL king
- 1 point for Nano APS king
- 1 point for Nano PL king
- 1 point for Extends Robot APS king
- 1 point for Implements Droid APS king
The User with the most overall points will be declared the winner of the tournament. This means that people with a wide variety of robots will tend to do better in this challenge.
3. You may not add bots that are not your own. This means that inactive bot authors will not be able to add their robots to the EliteTournament. Of course, nothing prevents you from adding your own old(or even ancient!) robots. I simply want robots made by people who still peek at the wiki now and again.
Note: I realize that this doesn't contain any melee rankings, but I couldn't think of a simple way to rank the different melee robots. If anyone has a good idea for how I can do this, I will include it in the tournament.
Well, that's the EliteTournament. Keep in mind that it is a just for fun thing, and the scores from it shouldn't be taken too seriously. This should be an exciting addition to the scores obtained from the RoboRumble though. All you have to do is tell me what robots to run in it, and I'll provide the scores. Thoughts? Comments? Criticism?--CrazyBassoonist 17:55, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
Seems like a neat idea. I'm not sure an "overall winner" is such a great idea, since so few people have enough bots to cover all the categories, but maybe it would encourage some of us to write some. In general, I definitely like the idea of focusing on beating each other instead of crushing the weak. Though crushing the weak may still work in this format, to a degree. =) I still want to do a bracket tourney of the top of the main RoboRumble, basically run how the Twin Duel was - round robin to seed a bracket tourney. Not sure if that will happen by month's end... --Voidious 14:35, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
It sounds interesting. I kind of agree with Voidious regarding the "overall winner" bit, particularly considering the 'droid' and 'robot' categories, but yeah. By the way, any particular reason for APS and PL? Maybe it's just me personally, but I find survival % most interesting these days (I mean, both the "score" system and winner-take-all seem a bit artificial to me). --Rednaxela 16:44, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
In such a tournament my poor abuse Seraphim might actually do well (it's good at anti-surfer). — Chase-san 19:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
The overall winner thing really doesn't matter that much to me. I only added it as an incentive to the more competitive-minded robocoders and to encourage people to put more types of robots into the tournament; this idea was more about seeing how our robots do when weighed only against other decent ones. As for the APS and PL, I picked the APS because that's what we use in the rumble, and the PL because that encourages the idea of beating the strong instead of crushing the weak. A survival category would probably be an excellent addition, so I might just add that--CrazyBassoonist 21:48, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
To clarify: I have no qualms about removing the Overall Winner entirely if its unpopular--CrazyBassoonist 21:49, 21 February 2011 (UTC)
Help???
For some reason, when I save in eclipse it updates the file in the src folder, but not the bin folder. This means that I can create new bots and update the ones I have, but I can't change what's in the bin folder so the robocode robots always stay the same. Does anyone have any idea what to do about this?--CrazyBassoonist 05:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Hi! I didn't understand your question completely. Do you mean, that Eclipse did not compile your code when you press ctrl+s? Try to execute "make" or "build" command (i don't remeber for sure, because i don't use eclipse for 3 years) --Jdev 05:51, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Eclipse still compiles my code when I press ctrl+s. The problem is that when I save, normally two things happen: eclipse creates a .java file in the src folder, and a .jar or .class(don't remember which) in the bin folder, which is what robocode actually uses. Right now, when I press save, all that happens is that a .java file is created or edited in the src folder, and the bin folder remains unchanged.--CrazyBassoonist 13:17, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
That means Eclipse doesn't compile your code. Try to make sure that Project > Build automatically is checked. Otherwise you have to build the project yourself (Project > Build all). --Nat Pavasant 13:47, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
That fixed it! Thanks a lot:-)--CrazyBassoonist 14:01, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
Mercutio
I'm about to release yet another micro melee bot: Mercutio. I decided that with all the HOT-dodging movements going on at the top of the rumble, I might try something similar but at a more comfortable codesize level. Mercutio has an Anti-Gravity movement (technically a minimum risk movement with a max distance of 36) that focuses on dodging simple targeting. My tests indicate it should be about top ten in micro melee, and while I haven't tested it much in one-on-one it might be decent as its movement dodges fast targeting really well.--CrazyBassoonist 15:26, 20 December 2009 (UTC)
Suspicious Scores
This: http://darkcanuck.net/rumble/BattleDetails?game=minimeleerumble&name=oog.melee.Capulet%200.1&vs=dmsr.MiniR101%200.4--CrazyBassoonist 23:55, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
I Just added some debug in my User_talk:DavidR#Melee_client_problem.3F page about the problems with my meleerumble client. --DavidR 09:07, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
A Droid????
Some info about CapuletDroid: Its a nano-sized droid based on Capulet. The only way its movement differs from Capulet's is that its movement does not take perpendicularity into account; it also has a decent targeting/energy management system that uses the angles from bullets that hit it to figure out where to aim. I'm pretty proud of this bot, as it took a lot of squeezing and innovations to get it to work. I doubt if it'll be very competitive, but it should be at least in the top half of the nano melee rankings. I commented the code out, as it seems to me like a pretty good source of Droid-related information--CrazyBassoonist 03:10, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
That's neat! Always fun to see someone exploring new territory. =) Those Melee scores are looking pretty respectable. You going to keep working on it, or just a one-off experiment? I wonder how high it can go... --Voidious 16:34, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I have same idea=) So may be, sometime, when i finish UltraMarine, i will build rival for CapuletDroid and we will give life for new league=) --Jdev 17:29, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Yes, I do plan to keep working on this (of course, I think this for every robot....) and it would be nice to have another droid to compete against=)--CrazyBassoonist 23:20, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
There are several Droids out there if you search well enough... --Nat Pavasant 13:28, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Hmm... I looked, but Bvh.hdr.hodur was the only one I could find (in the rumble), and it isn't even in the meleerumble. So some more competition would be nice=)--CrazyBassoonist 02:04, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
The only one I've played with is Tiresias, by Kawigi. You can find some download links to Droids at oldwiki:ImplementsDroidCompetition/Participants. --Voidious 02:32, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
Uh oh
Haha big problem: I just noticed there are now exactly 666 articles. Notice how this coincides with the kinsens nanobot...... Haha just joking--CrazyBassoonist 01:11, 4 October 2009 (UTC)
Melee scoring
I have a question... Will releasing my new robot at the same time as a shadow version affect it's score at all? I mean because they'll both be getting run a lot, and having an awesome robot like that in the same battle affects how well it does a ton--CrazyBassoonist 23:40, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
No, don't worry, they won't run all their battles together. The client appears to pick one of the bots that needs battles and run a random battle for that one bot. You'll just get battles half as fast as you would if you were the only bot needing battles. --Voidious 23:47, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Ah, well that's good(Sorry ABC). I'm excited about this robot, it scored ahead of GlowBlowMelee consistently against one group of robots =). I'm hoping top ten for it--CrazyBassoonist 23:50, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
Note though, that it could have a slight affect, because that new version of Shadow would be in 3.something% of your battles by chance, and if it's hugely better/worse than the old version it would have a little affect on your score, but... well nothing big. While it's tiny between two increments of a bot, it's theoretically nonzero. A newly introduced bot (particularly something like a second sitting duck...) would likely have a bigger affect than a different version of Shadow, but still probably not big. Intoducing a second sitting duck to rumble is probably the worst-case for how much a single newly introduced bot could affect the rumble. Unless... you count something diabolic like a rambot specifically designed to attack Shadow and nobody else... --Rednaxela 04:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Well I'm quite happy with how it appears to be doing now, no matter how the melee scoring works--CrazyBassoonist 22:28, 8 September 2009 (UTC)
Deep Robocoders
Haha, I just found this page on the old wiki: http://old.robowiki.net/cgi-bin/robowiki?MultiThreading/Ethics. It was very interesting to see robocoders arguing philosophy:-)--CrazyBassoonist 01:06, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- If you look at oldwiki:ABC, you will find Robocoder discuss football (soccer) =) » Nat | Talk » 02:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Repository
I'm getting this message when I try to go to the bots page on the repository:
Exception: JspTagException Message: SQLState = 28000 ErrorCode = 1045 Message = Access denied for user 'robocode'@'localhost' (using password: YES) StackTrace: java.sql.SQLException: Access denied for user 'robocode'@'localhost' (using password: YES) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:2928) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:771) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.secureAuth411(MysqlIO.java:3649) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.doHandshake(MysqlIO.java:1176) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:2558) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.(Connection.java:1485) at com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:266) at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:525) at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171) at com.pvi.sql.ConnectionResolver.getConnection(ConnectionResolver.java:227) at com.pvi.sql.ConnectionResolver.getConnection(ConnectionResolver.java:199) at com.robocode.sql.RoboCodeDatabaseUtil.getConnection(RoboCodeDatabaseUtil.java:80) at com.robocode.apps.repository.pagebeans.Categories.pageAccess(Categories.java:148) at com.pvi.servlet.jsp.PageBeanUtils.pageAccessRecurse(PageBeanUtils.java:721) at com.pvi.servlet.jsp.PageBeanUtils.pageAccess(PageBeanUtils.java:382) at com.pvi.servlet.jsp.Controller.pageAccess(Controller.java:1047) at com.df.servlet.jsp.tag.PageAccessTag.doEndTag(PageAccessTag.java:88) at org.apache.jsp.Categories_jsp._jspService(Categories_jsp.java:193) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:98) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:331) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:329) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:265) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:269) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:172) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:108) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:174) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:875) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:528) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:81) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:689) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613) Page: error.jsp User: 66.98.164.89 Time: 8-18-09 10:48:51 AM URL: http://git-danlynn.dyndns.org:8081/error.jsp Referer: http://robocoderepository.com/ Query: null Stack Trace: javax.servlet.jsp.JspTagException: SQLState = 28000 ErrorCode = 1045 Message = Access denied for user 'robocode'@'localhost' (using password: YES) StackTrace: java.sql.SQLException: Access denied for user 'robocode'@'localhost' (using password: YES) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:2928) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.checkErrorPacket(MysqlIO.java:771) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.secureAuth411(MysqlIO.java:3649) at com.mysql.jdbc.MysqlIO.doHandshake(MysqlIO.java:1176) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.createNewIO(Connection.java:2558) at com.mysql.jdbc.Connection.(Connection.java:1485) at com.mysql.jdbc.NonRegisteringDriver.connect(NonRegisteringDriver.java:266) at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:525) at java.sql.DriverManager.getConnection(DriverManager.java:171) at com.pvi.sql.ConnectionResolver.getConnection(ConnectionResolver.java:227) at com.pvi.sql.ConnectionResolver.getConnection(ConnectionResolver.java:199) at com.robocode.sql.RoboCodeDatabaseUtil.getConnection(RoboCodeDatabaseUtil.java:80) at com.robocode.apps.repository.pagebeans.Categories.pageAccess(Categories.java:148) at com.pvi.servlet.jsp.PageBeanUtils.pageAccessRecurse(PageBeanUtils.java:721) at com.pvi.servlet.jsp.PageBeanUtils.pageAccess(PageBeanUtils.java:382) at com.pvi.servlet.jsp.Controller.pageAccess(Controller.java:1047) at com.df.servlet.jsp.tag.PageAccessTag.doEndTag(PageAccessTag.java:88) at org.apache.jsp.Categories_jsp._jspService(Categories_jsp.java:193) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:98) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:331) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:329) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:265) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:269) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:172) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:108) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:174) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:875) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:528) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:81) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:689) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613) at com.df.servlet.jsp.tag.PageAccessTag.doEndTag(PageAccessTag.java:92) at org.apache.jsp.Categories_jsp._jspService(Categories_jsp.java:193) at org.apache.jasper.runtime.HttpJspBase.service(HttpJspBase.java:98) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.service(JspServletWrapper.java:331) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.serviceJspFile(JspServlet.java:329) at org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet.service(JspServlet.java:265) at javax.servlet.http.HttpServlet.service(HttpServlet.java:729) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.internalDoFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:269) at org.apache.catalina.core.ApplicationFilterChain.doFilter(ApplicationFilterChain.java:188) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardWrapperValve.invoke(StandardWrapperValve.java:213) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContextValve.invoke(StandardContextValve.java:172) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardHostValve.invoke(StandardHostValve.java:127) at org.apache.catalina.valves.ErrorReportValve.invoke(ErrorReportValve.java:117) at org.apache.catalina.core.StandardEngineValve.invoke(StandardEngineValve.java:108) at org.apache.catalina.connector.CoyoteAdapter.service(CoyoteAdapter.java:174) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11Processor.process(Http11Processor.java:875) at org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11BaseProtocol$Http11ConnectionHandler.processConnection(Http11BaseProtocol.java:665) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.PoolTcpEndpoint.processSocket(PoolTcpEndpoint.java:528) at org.apache.tomcat.util.net.LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.runIt(LeaderFollowerWorkerThread.java:81) at org.apache.tomcat.util.threads.ThreadPool$ControlRunnable.run(ThreadPool.java:689) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:613)
Anyone know how to deal with this?--CrazyBassoonist 14:54, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- Well... nothing you can do about it except not use robocoderepository.com and possibly make sure that site's maintainer knows about the problem. It's never really seemed reliable ever so I don't think I could really recommend using it anyway. --Rednaxela 15:01, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
- From what I had heard, supposedly the owner of RobocodeRepository.com was working on a remake in Ruby on Rails, however no news has been heard in a long time, so that would count as inactive yeah. --Rednaxela 16:03, 18 August 2009 (UTC)
Montague
I just realized, that you named Mercutio and Capulet from Romeo and Juliet (doh!). To keep up with the Romeo and Juliet theme, I suggest that you name your next bot Montague. Doesn't anyone else agree with me? --Khanguy 23:24, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
You're right, I also had a nanobot (now retired) named Tybalt. I'll make Montague the name of my next melee bot=)--CrazyBassoonist 01:08, 13 April 2011 (UTC)
