Difference between revisions of "User:PiRocks"
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I am an experienced Java programmer. As you can guess, I love pi ( and also pie). In RoboRumble, I use the package name "hacker". | I am an experienced Java programmer. As you can guess, I love pi ( and also pie). In RoboRumble, I use the package name "hacker". | ||
− | I am using "work- | + | I am using "work-a-round" methods for my robots to make them better as well as find security glitches. |
== Hacker Robots == | == Hacker Robots == | ||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
:So far, the only major glitch I have found is that you can cheat the SecurityManager by achieving a "SafeContext". One easy way to do this is using the following Class... | :So far, the only major glitch I have found is that you can cheat the SecurityManager by achieving a "SafeContext". One easy way to do this is using the following Class... | ||
<syntaxhighlight> | <syntaxhighlight> | ||
− | package | + | package <your package here>; |
/** | /** | ||
− | * | + | * Cheat - allows access to blocked pacakges. |
*/ | */ | ||
− | public class | + | public class Cheat extends robocode.security.RobocodeSecurityManager//Choose a class in the package you |
+ | //wish to access. | ||
{ | { | ||
− | + | public Cheat() { | |
− | public static void loopHole( | + | super(null, null,true ,true);//replace the parameters with whatever your class requires. |
− | + | } | |
− | // | + | public static void loopHole(<any argument you wish to use>) throws Exception { |
− | + | //This code here has full access to the package you want to use. | |
− | // | + | //use this method instead of creating a new class to avoid having the class you extended |
− | + | //do things that you don't wish it to do. | |
} | } | ||
} | } | ||
</syntaxhighlight> | </syntaxhighlight> | ||
+ | :I'm not sure that you can do anything with this, since most of what you can do is prohibited due to a robot's thread not being in the safethread list in the SecurityManager. [[User:PiRocks|PiRocks]] 01:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
+ | == Bored == | ||
+ | I've gotten bored with working on ma robot so I've decided to run robocode with no security and see what kind of mayhem I | ||
+ | can concoct. Any suggestions??? |
Latest revision as of 03:49, 7 July 2010
Contents
PiRocks
I am an experienced Java programmer. As you can guess, I love pi ( and also pie). In RoboRumble, I use the package name "hacker".
I am using "work-a-round" methods for my robots to make them better as well as find security glitches.
Hacker Robots
Right now my only robot is Destroyer. It is a 1-v-1 and Melee robot. Unfortunately, it was built and tested using Robocode v1.7.2.1 Beta, which has a different SecurityManager. Because of this my work-a-round method to create more threads doesn't work, resulting in auto disqualification. I am trying to fix this, but my next update will probably take a while.
Glitches
1.6.1.4 Glitches
- So far, the only major glitch I have found is that you can cheat the SecurityManager by achieving a "SafeContext". One easy way to do this is using the following Class...
package <your package here>;
/**
* Cheat - allows access to blocked pacakges.
*/
public class Cheat extends robocode.security.RobocodeSecurityManager//Choose a class in the package you
//wish to access.
{
public Cheat() {
super(null, null,true ,true);//replace the parameters with whatever your class requires.
}
public static void loopHole(<any argument you wish to use>) throws Exception {
//This code here has full access to the package you want to use.
//use this method instead of creating a new class to avoid having the class you extended
//do things that you don't wish it to do.
}
}
- I'm not sure that you can do anything with this, since most of what you can do is prohibited due to a robot's thread not being in the safethread list in the SecurityManager. PiRocks 01:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Bored
I've gotten bored with working on ma robot so I've decided to run robocode with no security and see what kind of mayhem I can concoct. Any suggestions???