Difference between revisions of "User:Beaming"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "== Background == I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by User:Jdev, and than I tried it one more time in August 2013...")
 
m (notes about zapper bot)
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
 
== Background ==
 
== Background ==
  
I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by [[User:Jdev]], and than I tried it one more time in August 2013 and now I am hooked.
+
I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by [[User:Jdev]], and then I tried it one more time in August 2013 and now I am hooked.
 +
 
 +
== Robowiki back ups ==
 +
 
 +
I am looking for a feasible way to maintain [[Robowiki Mirrors]]
 +
 
 +
== My Bots ==
  
== My Bot(s) ==
 
 
=== Current ===
 
=== Current ===
* [[EvBot]] this is all around  [[MegaBot]]  which does quite well in melee and not so well in 1 on 1.
 
  
=== Planned ===
+
* '''[[zapper]]''' is my newest bot which is development since early 2019. I decided to rewrite everything to fit in a single file. The modular approach which I used earlier was hard to push forward. Sadly it still (in early 2023) just a bit worse than [[EvBotNG]].
* Codename IWillFireNoBullet. I would like to see how high in the ranks a pacifist like bot can climb.
+
 
 +
=== Past ===
 +
The following bots are using the same framework and the only difference is in their gun choice.
 +
 
 +
* '''[[EvBotNG]]'''. EvBot New Generation - my  main all around bot. Very good in melee (top 20), just above top 100 in 1on1. Starting from about version 2.8, it outperforms [[EvBot]].
 +
* '''[[IWillFireNoBullet]]'''. This bot never fire. I would like to see how high in the ranks a pacifist bot can climb. Well it is 128th in melee, i.e., better than half of the bots, and around 700th out of 1000 in 1on1.
 +
* '''[[awful]]'''. This bot want to lose in any competition, and its trying to be the best at it. I rediscover this fun competition "be worse than sample.SittingDuck" in September 2017, see [[Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Keeping worse bots/reply (2)]]. This is my attempt to beat the rest. I proudly report that it is 4th from the bottom.
 +
 
 +
=== Far past ===
 +
* '''[[EvBot]]''' is my very first bot. It is all around  [[MegaBot]]  which does quite well in melee and not so well in 1 on 1.
 +
 
 +
 
 +
[[Category:Bot Authors|Beaming]]
 +
 
 +
__NOTOC__

Latest revision as of 01:10, 23 January 2023

Background

I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by User:Jdev, and then I tried it one more time in August 2013 and now I am hooked.

Robowiki back ups

I am looking for a feasible way to maintain Robowiki Mirrors

My Bots

Current

  • zapper is my newest bot which is development since early 2019. I decided to rewrite everything to fit in a single file. The modular approach which I used earlier was hard to push forward. Sadly it still (in early 2023) just a bit worse than EvBotNG.

Past

The following bots are using the same framework and the only difference is in their gun choice.

  • EvBotNG. EvBot New Generation - my main all around bot. Very good in melee (top 20), just above top 100 in 1on1. Starting from about version 2.8, it outperforms EvBot.
  • IWillFireNoBullet. This bot never fire. I would like to see how high in the ranks a pacifist bot can climb. Well it is 128th in melee, i.e., better than half of the bots, and around 700th out of 1000 in 1on1.
  • awful. This bot want to lose in any competition, and its trying to be the best at it. I rediscover this fun competition "be worse than sample.SittingDuck" in September 2017, see Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Keeping worse bots/reply (2). This is my attempt to beat the rest. I proudly report that it is 4th from the bottom.

Far past

  • EvBot is my very first bot. It is all around MegaBot which does quite well in melee and not so well in 1 on 1.