Difference between revisions of "User:Beaming"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (added note about EvBotNG) |
m (notes about zapper bot) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Background == | == Background == | ||
| − | I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by [[User:Jdev]], and | + | I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by [[User:Jdev]], and then I tried it one more time in August 2013 and now I am hooked. |
| − | == My | + | == Robowiki back ups == |
| + | |||
| + | I am looking for a feasible way to maintain [[Robowiki Mirrors]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | == My Bots == | ||
=== Current === | === Current === | ||
| + | |||
| + | * '''[[zapper]]''' is my newest bot which is development since early 2019. I decided to rewrite everything to fit in a single file. The modular approach which I used earlier was hard to push forward. Sadly it still (in early 2023) just a bit worse than [[EvBotNG]]. | ||
| + | |||
| + | === Past === | ||
The following bots are using the same framework and the only difference is in their gun choice. | The following bots are using the same framework and the only difference is in their gun choice. | ||
| − | * '''[[EvBotNG]]'''. EvBot New Generation - my main all around bot. Very good in melee, just | + | * '''[[EvBotNG]]'''. EvBot New Generation - my main all around bot. Very good in melee (top 20), just above top 100 in 1on1. Starting from about version 2.8, it outperforms [[EvBot]]. |
* '''[[IWillFireNoBullet]]'''. This bot never fire. I would like to see how high in the ranks a pacifist bot can climb. Well it is 128th in melee, i.e., better than half of the bots, and around 700th out of 1000 in 1on1. | * '''[[IWillFireNoBullet]]'''. This bot never fire. I would like to see how high in the ranks a pacifist bot can climb. Well it is 128th in melee, i.e., better than half of the bots, and around 700th out of 1000 in 1on1. | ||
| + | * '''[[awful]]'''. This bot want to lose in any competition, and its trying to be the best at it. I rediscover this fun competition "be worse than sample.SittingDuck" in September 2017, see [[Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Keeping worse bots/reply (2)]]. This is my attempt to beat the rest. I proudly report that it is 4th from the bottom. | ||
| − | === | + | === Far past === |
| − | * '''[[EvBot]]''' | + | * '''[[EvBot]]''' is my very first bot. It is all around [[MegaBot]] which does quite well in melee and not so well in 1 on 1. |
Latest revision as of 01:10, 23 January 2023
Background
I am physicist by training. My first run with Robocode was in August 2012 after an article by User:Jdev, and then I tried it one more time in August 2013 and now I am hooked.
Robowiki back ups
I am looking for a feasible way to maintain Robowiki Mirrors
My Bots
Current
- zapper is my newest bot which is development since early 2019. I decided to rewrite everything to fit in a single file. The modular approach which I used earlier was hard to push forward. Sadly it still (in early 2023) just a bit worse than EvBotNG.
Past
The following bots are using the same framework and the only difference is in their gun choice.
- EvBotNG. EvBot New Generation - my main all around bot. Very good in melee (top 20), just above top 100 in 1on1. Starting from about version 2.8, it outperforms EvBot.
- IWillFireNoBullet. This bot never fire. I would like to see how high in the ranks a pacifist bot can climb. Well it is 128th in melee, i.e., better than half of the bots, and around 700th out of 1000 in 1on1.
- awful. This bot want to lose in any competition, and its trying to be the best at it. I rediscover this fun competition "be worse than sample.SittingDuck" in September 2017, see Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Keeping worse bots/reply (2). This is my attempt to beat the rest. I proudly report that it is 4th from the bottom.
Far past
- EvBot is my very first bot. It is all around MegaBot which does quite well in melee and not so well in 1 on 1.
