Difference between revisions of "User talk:Voidious/Robocode Version Tests"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (grammar =() |
(reply) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I don't think there are any differences between 1.6.1.4 and 1.7.1.1. The difference is quite big, 0.82%! But I think we are still using the fix, right? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 15:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | I don't think there are any differences between 1.6.1.4 and 1.7.1.1. The difference is quite big, 0.82%! But I think we are still using the fix, right? » <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> » 15:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Yes, it's a pretty big difference (0.72% actually). 250 battles might not be enough, though, maybe I should run more for that pairing. If there is a 0.72% difference, I'd probably be against the change. But there's lots more to test first - I see my 1.6.1.4 CPU constant is ~20% higher than the 1.7* versions, that could even play a part. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 20:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 21:36, 17 July 2009
I don't think there are any differences between 1.6.1.4 and 1.7.1.1. The difference is quite big, 0.82%! But I think we are still using the fix, right? » Nat | Talk » 15:51, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
Yes, it's a pretty big difference (0.72% actually). 250 battles might not be enough, though, maybe I should run more for that pairing. If there is a 0.72% difference, I'd probably be against the change. But there's lots more to test first - I see my 1.6.1.4 CPU constant is ~20% higher than the 1.7* versions, that could even play a part. --Voidious 20:36, 17 July 2009 (UTC)
