Difference between revisions of "User talk:Voidious/RoboWiki To-Do"

From Robowiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(reasons for "Unsure / why.)
 
(reply)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
** I don't think it cost CPU much.
 
** I don't think it cost CPU much.
 
&raquo; <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> &raquo; 14:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 
&raquo; <span style="font-size:0.9em;color:darkgreen;">[[User:Nat|Nat]] | [[User_talk:Nat|Talk]]</span> &raquo; 14:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
 +
 +
Say when I noticed it??
 +
 +
Javascript can still do some very bad / annoying things. And browsers have security vulnerabilities with Javascript sometimes (FireFox recently had one). We've had some horrible wikispam attacks since I've been here (on the old wiki), so I am very cautious on stuff like this. What benefit is there to offset the risk? Is this something other people want? If Wikipedia allows it, that does sway my decision, though.
 +
 +
--[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 15:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:28, 20 July 2009

Please say when you noticed it. I feel like I'm talking to nothing.

  • Consider user Javascript / CSS
    • There is no security issue. Wikipedia has it. If you are worry about XSS, then I must say it is not possible to modified another user's css/js.
  • Twitter feedback / changes
  • SVG support
    • I don't think it cost CPU much.

» Nat | Talk » 14:39, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Say when I noticed it??

Javascript can still do some very bad / annoying things. And browsers have security vulnerabilities with Javascript sometimes (FireFox recently had one). We've had some horrible wikispam attacks since I've been here (on the old wiki), so I am very cautious on stuff like this. What benefit is there to offset the risk? Is this something other people want? If Wikipedia allows it, that does sway my decision, though.

--Voidious 15:28, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Voidious/RoboWiki_To-Do&oldid=9355"