Difference between revisions of "Talk:Targeting Challenge RM/Results"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Skilgannon (talk | contribs) (→Triphammer: new section) |
(→Triphammer: thanks; rumble performance) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
== Triphammer == | == Triphammer == | ||
| + | Great work! I can't wait to see if these latest changes show any big improvement in performance in the rumble! --[[User:Skilgannon|Skilgannon]] 16:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | : Thanks. =) I actually used it in [[Diamond]] 1.39. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, it didn't show much improvement over the old KNN gun, but I'm glad it at least performed on par. [http://darkcanuck.net/rumble/RatingsCompare?game=roborumble&name=voidious.Diamond%201.39&vs=voidious.Diamond%201.372]. Maybe the points I lose to the VG are the bigger obstacle now, and of course I know there are just not nearly as many points left in the gun as in the movement. --[[User:Voidious|Voidious]] 16:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
Revision as of 17:57, 19 September 2009
Hmmm. So it seems my movement in CunobelinDC is pretty good =) --Skilgannon 15:04, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
- Pretty? I bet it a LOT better than Komarious/WeeksOnEnd and even RaikoMX, but anyway Marshmallow/TheImportanceOfMovement/MovementOrTargeting (I think it unreachable for now) » Nat | Talk » 15:12, 2 May 2009 (UTC)
Triphammer
Great work! I can't wait to see if these latest changes show any big improvement in performance in the rumble! --Skilgannon 16:24, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks. =) I actually used it in Diamond 1.39. Unfortunately, but not surprisingly, it didn't show much improvement over the old KNN gun, but I'm glad it at least performed on par. [1]. Maybe the points I lose to the VG are the bigger obstacle now, and of course I know there are just not nearly as many points left in the gun as in the movement. --Voidious 16:57, 19 September 2009 (UTC)
