Bot width and GuessFactors

From Talk:Waves/Precise Intersection
← Thread:Talk:Waves/Precise Intersection/Bot width and GuessFactors

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Bot width and GuessFactors

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Subject:

When GuessFactor normalize angles based on MEA, doesn´t it distort the edges of the bot?

Looks like bots with distances farther away than when the wave was collected are calculated as being wider than they really are. Similar distortion happens when bullet power changes.

Am I missing something?

Return to Thread:Talk:Waves/Precise Intersection/Bot width and GuessFactors.

In the gun, I only ever collect/project the center angle. I only use precise bot width in my gun to find the exact center angle in the range. I use an imprecise bot width as the bandwidth in my kernel density when aiming.

In movement, the precisely predicted bot width is also the bandwidth in my kernel density. I still ignore it whenever collecting angles.

Using only the center of the range makes sense.

I wonder how much improvement is due to precise calculation, and how much is due to distortion (imprecise/unpredictable calculation).

MN‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Waves/Precise_Intersection/Bot_width_and_GuessFactors#Bot_width_and_GuessFactors_1846"