View source for Talk:Waves/Precise Intersection

From Robowiki
< Talk:Waves
Revision as of 13:18, 18 May 2009 by Nat (talk | contribs) (add credit)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Talk:Waves/Precise Intersection
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Credits - Waves/Precise Intersection
Old wiki page: Rednaxela/SuperBotWidth
Original author(s): Rednaxela
Credits - Waves/Precise Intersection
Old wiki page: Garm/BotwidthCalculation
Original author(s): Krabb
Credits - Waves/Precise Intersection
Old wiki page: Skilgannon/PreciseIntersect
Original author(s): Skilgannon

Contents

Thread titleRepliesLast modified
Bot width and GuessFactors220:20, 26 November 2012

Bot width and GuessFactors

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

 

Return to Thread:Talk:Waves/Precise Intersection/Bot width and GuessFactors.

In the gun, I only ever collect/project the center angle. I only use precise bot width in my gun to find the exact center angle in the range. I use an imprecise bot width as the bandwidth in my kernel density when aiming.

In movement, the precisely predicted bot width is also the bandwidth in my kernel density. I still ignore it whenever collecting angles.

Voidious19:54, 26 November 2012

Using only the center of the range makes sense.

I wonder how much improvement is due to precise calculation, and how much is due to distortion (imprecise/unpredictable calculation).

MN20:19, 26 November 2012