Nominations

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Nominations

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

 

Return to Thread:Talk:Voidious/RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations.

Well, Nene has more than earned its place at #11 in PL. As for the others, my vote is definitely to stick to "top x bots" instead of hand picking bots we like.

Top 50 would include all those bots... I still like 30 and personally feel like even that's erring on the high side. (A bot at #30 has almost no chance vs DrussGT.) What do other people think?

Voidious‎02:46, 26 March 2013
 

For:

  • Nene, top 10 bot. I have no problems with someone entering it, but its turned for simple bots.

Against:

  • SandboxDT, impressive for its age. But not impressive enough.
  • RaikoMX, see SandboxDT.
  • Neuromancer, great at Melee, only decent in One on One.
  • CunobelinDC, entering it in the gigarumble just isn't fair.

Nominating:

  • Seraphim, decent post-debug, holds #10 Vote and #22 PL (PWIN). Tuned against surfers originally.
Chase‎04:23, 26 March 2013
 

If you want Sandbox DT you should do a separate "Classics" league. ;)

Wolfman‎07:47, 26 March 2013

That crossed my mind too. :-) Then I thought it's kind of silly to have an active rumble for bots that never get updated. And also, how to treat a bot like Shadow? Totally classic, but updated a lot more recently than others like DT.

It's not a sign of disrespect to leave those bots out of a "strongest bots rumble". Pretty sure most of those authors would want to earn their spot anyway, if they were active.

Voidious‎13:56, 26 March 2013
 
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Voidious/RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations#Nominations_3039"