Nominations

Fragment of a discussion from Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble
← Thread:Talk:Voidious/RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations/reply (3)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

If you want Sandbox DT you should do a separate "Classics" league. ;)

Return to Thread:Talk:Voidious/RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations/reply (3).

That crossed my mind too. :-) Then I thought it's kind of silly to have an active rumble for bots that never get updated. And also, how to treat a bot like Shadow? Totally classic, but updated a lot more recently than others like DT.

It's not a sign of disrespect to leave those bots out of a "strongest bots rumble". Pretty sure most of those authors would want to earn their spot anyway, if they were active.

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Voidious/RoboRumble/Participants/GigaRumble/Nominations/reply_(3)#Nominations_3039"