View source for User talk:Tmservo
These two versions of Linio, are different. jcz.linio.Linio 1.0,https://www.dropbox.com/s/m4yq1gsf6f67cmh/jcz.linio.Linio_1.0.jar jcz.linio.Linio 1.0.H,https://github.com/L1ni0/rcb-bin/raw/master/jcz.linio.Linio_1.0.H.jar
- [View source↑]
- [History↑]
Contents
First page |
Previous page |
Next page |
Last page |
Was that Random Movement version a experiment to see how good the the wave surfing is
24 is probably faster. Though it's largely irrelevant since it's probably going to be faster than anything else in either configuration anyway.
Let me show you something Rednaxela's and Skilgannon's kd-trees are tied in speed. And Skilgannon's kd-tree uses a bucket size of 50. You said lower bucket size is better. Therefore if Skilgannon's kd-tree used a bucket size of 24. It might be faster than Rednaxela's kd-tree.
Because RoboWiki Forcibly logged me off and wouldn't let me log in until this day Did anyone else have that same problem
From Oct 19th to 24th, the server had an out of disk space condition. That was causing failed logins among other things. That's fixed now.
Rules
1: You must be a beginner with some coding experience
2: You cannot copy a bot
3: Bot must be GNU GPL any version
4: Participants must sign up now by replying to this thread
5: The winner is the person who creates the best robot
6: Benchmark robots are all 12 wiki. prefix robots including BasicGFSurfer
7: The best robot is the best scoring robot against all 12 wiki. prefix robots
8: 1v1 for all 12 wiki. prefix robots
Tmservo, your categories are not defined and thus make sense only in your head.
Who is qualified as beginner? What is the metric? Is it a time devoted to robocode or success of a typical bot from an author?
Which 12 wiki bots are you referring to? What if some one add one more wiki bot?
Is this competition 1on1 or melee?
The part about "stolen" and "permission" seems to be redundant. What if someone use one of the top bots distributed with permissive license? Are they good to participate?
Please don't think that I want you to leave. I am complaining. I would like the questions (in their current form) to stop. But I'd also like a new member of the community. The following are my suggestions for how to ask questions on the robowiki:
1) Make sure your question is closely related to Robocode. It can be about algorithms that are not specific to Robocode, but it should be about the algorithms as applied to Robocode.
2) Make sure you punctuate your questions. It's not hard. Furthermore, it makes them easier to read.
3) Make sure you pay attention to the answers you receive. Read them before replying.
4) Make sure you thank people for helping you. We are all busy and have other things to do.
5) Make sure you have some understanding of the subject about which you are asking. If you don't, answering your questions isn't worth our time.
6) Make sure you search for an answer to the question before asking it. Use the search box in the left and/or google unless you know the information isn't easily available.
I'm glad you are interested in what I found to be the best way to learn programming, but I think that following the above guidelines will help you to learn.
Do you have any questions? Ask away.
Yep, I'm a jerk.
Punctuation error: "If you don't answering your questions isn't worth our time." Comma should be added after don't
As am I.
"Make sure your question is closely related to [Robocode]. It can be about algorithms that are not specific to [Robocode], but [it] should be about the algorithms as applied to [Robocode]."
Tmservo,
literumble needs your CPU cycles and not update. There is only one person who is currently donating CPU cycles to battle runs, no wonder there are almost no updates. [1]
P.S. Tmservo, it is hard to read a mind of a person. Please, add description/words to your posts, not just links or pictures.
i meant update via RoboRumble client and i need A Robocode 1.8.2.0 because i Updated to 1.8.3.0 a long time ago P.S what version do you use beaming
I use 1.8.2.0 since it the latest from which rumble accept stats.
I would prefer 1.7.3.0 since it seems to have a faster graphics in comparison to newer versions and I like to use for my internal program/debug/observe cycle.
If you go to the rumble statistic page you will see: Allowed Robocode versions: ['1.8.1.0', '1.8.2.0']
The reason only 1.8.1.0 and 1.8.2.0 are allowed is because they both have a bug which affects the scores, giving top bots a slightly lower score. If we want to switch to new versions we will have to delete all data and start fresh, because new versions fix the bug.
I think it is better to allow newer version to participate and to regenerate stats. It might boost number of contributors.
Robocode is hard enough to start. Not everyone will have enough patience to see that it requires older version for rumble. Besides it is better to debug/prototype a bot with the same version of robocode and rumble.
Suggestion about switching to newer versions.
If literumble kept separate average scores for each version on each pairing, it could support multiple versions at the same time.
And, maybe, using the version of the last upload on each pairing as the main version. Contributors could gradually upgrade their clients without need to reset the whole database.
Unused old version stats could be deleted after some time to free space.
These "which is better" questions for seemingly random bots aren't good questions. Besides, if you want to know I suggest you just check the comparison page on the roborumble server instead of making a thread here. If you have a question about a bot that's fine, but "which is better" is not a very useful question and you can get your answer on your own like from the link above.
Generally, Dynamic Clustering is better than traditional GFT. However, DC also requires more codesize. I had to cut the gun down to three dimensions, instead of EpeeistMicro's five segments. I also had to cut back the movement mode selection, energy management, and anti-ram behavior.
You're probably referring to what happens when one defines nested/inner/anonymous classes inside another class's java source file.
Perhaps if you included reasons in more of your questions, you would get more responses. As it is, you seem to be asking rather arbitrary questions to which the answers seem irrelevant.
Who knows? Not all bots are open source, and I agree with straw that this is not really relevant.
Given that new line characters in Java are optional, this robot is better than DrussGT. Also, I think that the "no free lunch theorem" rather limits what can be postulated of said hypothetical robot. But seriously, I'm finding your questions rather annoying. Could you please try using punctuation, multiple sentences, and acknowledging that you understand what we tell you?
Also, questions like "How do I make an X-tree?" don't really belong here. This isn't a general programming forum, and if you can't understand it by using google, you probably need to spend more time increasing your coding skills rather than asking what the best ______ in robocode is. I know we try to be welcoming on the robowiki, and people were very patient with me, but I think it seems like you need to learn more programming before you should worry about most of the questions you are asking. In fact, I'd say learning more programming would make it so you would never ask this question.
I don't mean to scare you away, but some of your questions seem to indicate that you need to learn more about programming. If you have questions about why the GF tutorial does certain things, then please ask them. If you're wondering how to write a priority R tree, then I don't think we'll have the time to help you.
Adding on, try not to be demanding in your questions... "Somebody answer this" or "Why won't anybody post a reply" are not really relevant. Responses usually take hours or even days to come. Be patient. This is also in the wiki postings thread.
And me being 10 minutes after AW is a coincidence.
And I HAD no programming skills earlier. I'm currently still a Robocode Noob and learning java.
how do i make a X-tree http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X-tree
Is that even robocode?
Most top bots use DC in their movement.
As for guns, Tomcat is the best bot without DC but does not use GF. XanderCat is the best bot with a GF gun but has multiple guns to go with it(it's not completely GF). The best bot with a single GF gun that I know of is WaveSerpent(Gilgalad has 2 GF guns).
By the way... you could have easily found out yourself. Look at the bots wiki pages.
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:User talk:Tmservo/pattern surfer.
First page |
Previous page |
Next page |
Last page |