Is it by design that meleerumble and roborumble are not archieved?

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:VoidBot
← Thread:User talk:VoidBot/Is it by design that meleerumble and roborumble are not archieved?/reply (2)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

I see. Then incomplete pairing is partially my fault. I introduce new version before pld one settles.

But do we really need the full set of pairings? If a bot missing 10% of a total number, than it must be very lucky to skip the best bots. It is unlikely that such a bot wiuld raise or sink to much with additional pairings.

If it has only one battle, it is a different story. I've seen my bot on top of the rumble after one battle :)

Beaming (talk)‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Full pairings isn't that difficult to achieve, so I'd rather only archive when we have the full set of data to compute the rankings correctly. There's only the one bot in 1v1 now that's an issue. We should be back to regular archives soon. :-)

Return to Thread:User talk:VoidBot/Is it by design that meleerumble and roborumble are not archieved?/reply (3).

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:User_talk:VoidBot/Is_it_by_design_that_meleerumble_and_roborumble_are_not_archieved%3F/reply_(2)#Is_it_by_design_that_meleerumble_and_roborumble_are_not_archieved.3F_4796"