Tradiotional MEA proof

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Xor/Better MEA formula
← Thread:User talk:Xor/Better MEA formula/Tradiotional MEA proof/reply (6)

Jump to navigation Jump to search

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

For wave surfers, I think my work is useful — [[User:Xor/Better_MEA_formula]], as the movement is constant with time, it is naturally suitable for multiple waves ;)

Return to Thread:User talk:Xor/Better MEA formula/Tradiotional MEA proof/reply (6).

The problem with your formula is that it does not match traditional MEA in the border cases.

The second problem that I not fully understand it. It looks like you are integrating angular velocity to an undefined time t.

Beaming (talk)‎

it matches orbital MEA in border cases though, as always moving perpendicular is impossible, so you have to fallback to orbital ;)

I'm integrating angular velocity from fire time to hit time, which is obviously the escape angle ;) sorry for not saying that clearly in advance, the article is still not finished ;)

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:User_talk:Xor/Better_MEA_formula/Tradiotional_MEA_proof/reply_(6)#Tradiotional_MEA_proof_5792"