View source for Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional

From Robowiki

< Talk:Maximum Escape Angle← Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional

Jump to navigation Jump to search

[View source↑]
[History↑]

Contents

Thread title	Replies	Last modified
can anyone make a better illustration	2	12:39, 10 March 2012

can anyone make a better illustration

So, I finally made a page that wasn't just for my robots. However, as you can see, my drawing skills need a lot of work. Does anyone who can draw want to try to make a better picture? Also, is my description understandable? Finally, I assumed that Combat uses this, but it might be a little different if MN wants to check it over to make sure it is correct.

AW‎

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

It´s exactly that. But "the angle most nearly perpendicular to the bearing from robot B to robot A which robot A can move at without hitting any walls" is a bit confuse. Maybe "The angle which gives the widest MEA without hitting any walls".

And a screenshot using graphical debugging would do a better job as illustration.

Return to Thread:Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/can anyone make a better illustration/reply.

I have no idea what it is describing so I cannot really make a better image.

— Chase-san‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maximum_Escape_Angle/Precise_Positional&oldid=23769#can_anyone_make_a_better_illustration_603"