View source for Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/Non-Iterative

From Robowiki

< Talk:Maximum Escape Angle‎ | Precise Positional← Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/Non-Iterative

Jump to navigation Jump to search

[View source↑]
[History↑]

Contents

Thread title	Replies	Last modified
Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope	3	08:57, 8 August 2019

Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope

http://web.archive.org/web/20030514212153/http://robocoderepository.com/jive/thread.jsp?forum=18&thread=1052

It seems that the past is full of treasure, yet lost in history if no one's still remembering. Anyway, I may be the first to give mathematical prove ;)

I'm looking forward to seeing more practical usages on Escape Envelope, apart from non-iterative positional max escape angle

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

I had always thought of this as a way of using guess factors in twin duel or team battles. The advantage it has over PIF and Displacement Vectors is that those two can actually go out of MEA in some cases. I have also been working on a mathematical formula but you know me, trigonometry is not my area of expertise =)

Return to Thread:Talk:Maximum Escape Angle/Precise Positional/Non-Iterative/Old discussion on the shape of escape envelope/reply.

Now you know the shape of escape envelope, apart from removing predicted locations outside walls, you can also remove those out side of escape circle. The intersection of the area of the escape circle and the battlefield is essentially escape area.

Thanks for posting this, Xor! The graphic is especially informative.

Enamel 32 (talk)‎

Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/w/index.php?title=Talk:Maximum_Escape_Angle/Precise_Positional/Non-Iterative&oldid=55892#Old_discussion_on_the_shape_of_escape_envelope_6635"