Talk:Robocode/Articles

Move to Robocode/Articles

I'm thinking that this page should be moved to Robocode/Articles, but I'm not sure. Opinions? --AaronR 23:57, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

It also occurred to me that maybe this should be "List of articles about Robocode", the way Wikipedia uses that naming convention. I don't know if I have a strong opinion on any of the titles, though... --Voidious 00:04, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I like that name better, since this isn't really part of the official Robocode documentation. --AaronR 00:06, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Alright, I moved it. The old page needs to be deleted. --AaronR 00:25, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

The intension of the page is to gather all relevant external documentaion about Robocode, but also e.g. RoboLeague, RoboRumble and other stuff. This way we have one page for it all. :) --Fnl 12:26, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

I moved the page. You are right AaronR. :-) --Fnl 11:46, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

Not exactly about Robocode

I ran across another paper that uses Robocode in its study but isn't strictly about Robocode. Is [1] the sort of thing we want to include? -- Kuuran 06:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Please use the edit button at the top when you are starting new section. I don't think this is considered as a Robocode's article, since I believe that many papers, especially one on machine learning, do use Robocode's as its testing framework. --Nat Pavasant 07:47, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Maybe that type of article should have its own section? I think we should include them, though, as they are still Robocode related. The two articles already listed about evolving bots would probably fall in this category, too. Now to Google this "Mikrobotti" they mention... =) --Voidious 13:11, 7 October 2009 (UTC)