Thread history

From Talk:LiteRumble
Viewing a history listing
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Time User Activity Comment
01:49, 6 December 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
20:21, 5 December 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
23:42, 3 December 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
08:03, 3 December 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
04:37, 27 November 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
12:31, 25 November 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (aargh link formatting)
11:49, 25 November 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
10:48, 25 November 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
03:12, 25 November 2014 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
19:26, 18 November 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
19:23, 18 November 2014 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
03:00, 20 November 2013 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
23:14, 19 November 2013 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
22:23, 19 November 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
15:26, 19 November 2013 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
14:51, 19 November 2013 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
11:03, 19 November 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
09:22, 19 November 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
18:41, 18 November 2013 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
17:55, 18 November 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
16:44, 18 November 2013 Beaming (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
13:50, 11 May 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
23:52, 10 May 2013 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) Comment text edited  
23:52, 10 May 2013 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) Comment text edited (Nevermind)
23:48, 10 May 2013 Rednaxela (talk | contribs) New reply created (Reply to LRP (ish))
23:28, 10 May 2013 Skilgannon (talk | contribs) New thread created  

One thing I really missed from the old rumble was the LRP, but without ELO/Glicko we can't really do the whole straight-line fit any more. So, instead I have added a Score Distribution image on every bot's details page. The red is APS and the green is Survival (as seen in image the mouseover). The image is directly embedded in the HTML using data URIs, so if you are using IE, 8 and later only, otherwise pretty much everything supports it. I'm also planning to add this to the BotCompare page so you can analyse differences in score compared to opponent score for both APS and survival.

Skilgannon (talk)23:28, 10 May 2013

Ahhh, neat stuff. That's very nifty with directly embedding the image data there. For some reason the image is displaying very tiny for me though under Firefox 20.0. It gets scaled to the box around it properly under Chromium, but not Firefox.

EDIT: Nevermind... the styles.css file was being cached and that was the problem. A ctrl-r fixed it.

Rednaxela (talk)23:48, 10 May 2013

Ah yeah, the styles.css was changed so you need to do a hard-reload.

I've now added the KNNPBI to the bot-details Scores Distribution, and the bot-compare has a Diff Distribution.

Skilgannon (talk)13:50, 11 May 2013
 

There is something fishy with a chart in the right part close to the end. If you look at above CunobelinDC score distribution you would see that there is no corresponding red points for stronger opponents, while blue and grean are there. This is quite common theme for other bots as well.

Also have a look at this EvBot score distribution you would see the problem with normalizing, i.e. about 1/4 of the space in the right part of the chart has no points. Which is non optimal use of the chart space.

Beaming (talk)16:44, 18 November 2013

Is it still showing the problem? I don't see anything wrong right now. I had some issues with (I suspect) bad bytecode and versioning, but that should be fixed now.

As for the EvBot chart, that is because in meleerumble nobody gets higher than ~75%, so the top 25% is empty. Although I guess I could normalise to the top score, I'd rather have the charts consistent as better bots are released.

Skilgannon (talk)17:55, 18 November 2013

Aha, I see now why melee charts were somewhat off.

But I insist that I do not see red points for X>95% for CunobelinDC. Look at 5 the rightmost green points, I cannot locate red (APS) or blue for the same X values. It might be aliasing problem or may be points are just on top of each other.

Beaming (talk)18:41, 18 November 2013

Green is survival, and so the X value is the average survival score of the enemy bot. The red and blue use enemy APS as the X value, not survival, and since survival scores are higher the green dots go further to the right.

I've actually thought about changing the X axis to just be enemy APS to make it easier to interpret. Or ordering the X-axis by rank instead of using APS values.

Skilgannon (talk)09:22, 19 November 2013

I've changed it so they all use APS on the X axis, so it should be clearer now.

Skilgannon (talk)11:03, 19 November 2013