Great and very detailed article!
← Thread:Talk:Binary Search PIF/Great and very detailed article!/reply (3)
Yes, I agree with that. It just happens that in a scenario where you get on average one scan every 4-5 ticks, and the average BFT is 50 or less, even the theoretical improvement becomes negligible. But I'm a guy who likes to have the worst case situations nicely covered :P
The interesting question for me is: "does this make my bot run faster?"
I do not have this answer, I only know that this helps me not skipping turns because of odd worst case situations.
Well, I think the worst cases is not about bft, but the entire round time. BFT is too small to make you skip a turn, but a bug most bot authors make could make the worst case round-long.
The catch-point is, how do you handle data from different round?
Yeah, it is, my gun was pretty slow in melee. Idk if I got what you mean. Can you clarify?
You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:
You can view and copy the source of this page.
Return to Thread:Talk:Binary Search PIF/Great and very detailed article!/reply (9).
Of course it is not only abount the BFT time, we still have a Kdtree, and the other components, but when we are talking about milliseconds it helps a lot.