What do you think about a GigaMeleeRumble?

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Good idea with the littlerumble. I've disabled the app for now, I can set that up tomorrow and copy data across, then re-enable the app.

I'd rather have only one version for submitting battles, simply because we don't know all the bugs yet. It is better to make the chosen version easily available than to allow possibly different versions to submit battles.

Skilgannon (talk)17:09, 2 May 2014

Ok. I am up and running with 1.9.2 hope you will see my CPUs contributions.

Beaming (talk)17:16, 2 May 2014

I see a lot of errors like this:

java.io.FileNotFoundException: http://literumble.appspot.com/UploadedResults
Unable to upload results meleerumble,35,1000x1000,beaming,1399046843566,SERVER ntc.Opposite 1.5,9870,3207,0 spinnercat.Omen 1.0,6542,1976,0

Am I the only one?

Beaming (talk)18:59, 2 May 2014

The app is disabled until I get a chance to copy the data over to another app which won't allow uploads, which will be tomorrow evening. So you can pause clients until then.

Skilgannon (talk)19:07, 2 May 2014

Another question.

What is the official java version to be used with robocode?

I personally use java 6 but I think some bots are compiled with java 7 and do not run on my machine. Shall I switch to java 7?

Beaming (talk)17:18, 2 May 2014

If you're using Sun/Oracle Java, I would strongly argue you should not be using Java 6 anymore, and should not have been for the last year, because you're not getting security updates.

If you're using OpenJDK instead of the Sun/Oracle version, you can still get security updates for Java 6, so that isn't an issue.

As OpenJDK 6 doesn't have official Windows builds, and Sun/Oracle Java 6 does not get security updates, perhaps it is best to as a rule not be using any version of Java 6 (even if it has recent security patches) for Roborumble, as new Windows users submitting bots cannot easily test with Java 6.

Rednaxela (talk)17:36, 2 May 2014

OK. Get it. I was using openJDK all this time. I will switch to java7 in my clients. There are some nice additions for Point2D class which I was tempting to use instead of my own implementations.

Beaming (talk)18:56, 2 May 2014

Literumble is up and running, accepting contributions. There is a static copy of the old data at staticrumble.appspot.com. I'll keep an eye on it from my side, and please let me know if you see any issues with your clients. In a few days, when we're sure everything is working, I'll delete the data and we can start from fresh.

Skilgannon (talk)09:16, 4 May 2014

All my clients show in rumble and meleerumble

OK. Queue full,Wisdom vs GridFu discarded.

naturally, with different bots name.

There is something fishy, since than I see the same bot pair added to queue over and over with messages like this

OK. Wisdom vs GridFu added to queue in 41ms

Beaming (talk)14:50, 4 May 2014

Still something is fishy, on one of my clients I see multiple (like 100) attempt to do something with stat uploading. Currently the following happening, first I bunch of "queue is full" than

OK. Queue full,Tidus vs Zealot discarded.

for this pair of bots.

Above error are for the rumble client, I also run the meleerumble on the same machine and that one complains about Wisdom vs GridFu as in above message, with similar numerous attempts.

What is strange is that the other rumble client seems to behave proper on the other machine. Both machines have identical installations of robocode and java.

Beaming (talk)04:57, 6 May 2014

I think I found the problem. Have to delete content of files and temp directories. Files dir contained the results1v1.txt file with 12MB size which sounds excessive.

Beaming (talk)05:19, 6 May 2014

It seems to be stuck at 'queue full' most of the time.

Regarding the same bot pair added multiple times, perhaps you're referring to how it has to upload once for each rumble that's fitting for the pair of bots? (i.e. the different size categories)

Rednaxela (talk)16:11, 4 May 2014

The reason the queue is full so much is that uploads are happening at a rate of ~35/s, but I can only process ~5/s. I'll work more on optimising load and store times, but there is only so much I can do with that...

Skilgannon (talk)17:37, 4 May 2014

We could upgrade the rumble protocol to implement bulk uploads, allowing bulk commits in the server.

MN (talk)00:49, 6 May 2014

Uh... somebody's client is misconfigured, and uploading a bunch of stuff to the Minirumble which doesn't belong.

For example, "simonton.beta.LifelongObsession 0.5.1" is a Megabot.

Can folks who are currently contributing check that their client isn't doing this please?

Rednaxela (talk)00:46, 7 May 2014

Where to look for it?

Beaming (talk)01:39, 7 May 2014

Beaming, looking at logs it seems to be coming from one of your clients. I see in the Robocode release notes that fixed a bug with the codesize generation. Which Robocode version are you running?

Skilgannon (talk)07:57, 7 May 2014

Does it come from IP starting from 70 or 128?

The one at 70 somehow does not generate codesize1v1.txt file, though they all run robocode-

Any advise would be welcome.

Beaming (talk)12:57, 7 May 2014