Is there a mistake in Rumble battle staging

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Edited by author.
Last edit: 05:57, 22 February 2023

What do you mean by avoiding particular bots. From the code, LiteRumble selects missing pairings first, then pairings with less battles, etc.

Given enough time, each bot should have similar amount of battles.

Xor (talk)‎05:46, 21 February 2023

Ups, I posted wrong link to Jen rating, see http://literumble.appspot.com/BotDetails?game=roborumble&name=voidious.micro.Jen%201.11&order=-Battles

I do use LiteRumble to check for my bot improvement (if I run clients anyway, why not update "real" rating). But the issue I report is unrelated to my bot.

Beaming (talk)‎04:59, 22 February 2023

OK, a thought the missing pairings is related to your bot (which just get updated), but it turns out to be an ancient one.

Xor (talk)‎07:06, 22 February 2023
 

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Is there a mistake in Rumble battle staging/reply (5).

  1. We need to find out whether they have only 1 pairings 10 years ago. If so, we could add back the missing pairings from backup.
  2. From the code, "Battles" is merely a counter. If it shows 1 pairing, then there must be data loss unless it's 1 initially.
Xor (talk)‎07:10, 22 February 2023
 
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:RoboRumble/Participants/Is_there_a_mistake_in_Rumble_battle_staging/reply#Is_there_a_mistake_in_Rumble_battle_staging_6951"