APS 95.43 is crazy

Jump to navigation Jump to search

Getting at least 70% against everyone . . . And more than 80% survival, did you get an extra batterypack or so ?

GrubbmGait (talk)‎14:12, 10 January 2024

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Version History/APS 95.43 is crazy/reply (2).

That is very solid. Btw how can you sure that each changes grant you positive APS since it’s very small, being hard to evaluate.

Xor (talk)‎03:45, 11 January 2024

I do test changes against a big subset of the roborumble bots (with many seasons to make sure results are significant)

--Kev (talk)‎18:42, 11 January 2024

Thanks, that sounds practical. I’m always doing a few seasons on the full population to test out small changes, which takes a few hours on newest hardware. However, it is still hard to make 0.1 APS changes significant.

Xor (talk)‎03:57, 17 January 2024

Yeah, you need to run a lot of seasons, but of course that's slow. I think the right way to develop a strong bot would be to operate like the stockfish chess engine where every change is evaluated for improving performance, but I mostly just develop on my laptop so I don't have enough compute to do that.

--Kev (talk)‎04:35, 19 January 2024
 
 
 
 
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:BeepBoop/Version_History/APS_95.43_is_crazy/reply#APS_95.43_is_crazy_6969"