Difference between revisions of "Glacier/GlacialHawk"
< Glacier
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(1.1 rating and 1.2 info) |
(1.2 rating, 1.3 info) |
||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<!-- {{subst:rumblestats:meleerumble|ags.muse.GlacialHawk x.x|RumbleStatsDefault}} --> | <!-- {{subst:rumblestats:meleerumble|ags.muse.GlacialHawk x.x|RumbleStatsDefault}} --> | ||
| + | * '''1.3''' - 19/9/2009 | ||
| + | ** ''Rating pending'' | ||
| + | ** Fancy new experimental modeling of bullet-hit-probability at possible angles. Should work better than simply summing the movement profiles in the common 'shadow's melee gun' style. At least, it should once I get it tweaked... | ||
| + | |||
* '''1.2''' - 18/9/2009 | * '''1.2''' - 18/9/2009 | ||
| − | ** | + | ** {{RumbleStatsDefault|link=http://darkcanuck.net/rumble/RatingsDetails?game=meleerumble&name=ags.muse.GlacialHawk+1.2|rumble=MeleeRumble|scorelabel=APS|score=68.2|rank=7th|win=278|loss=6|plrank=6th|glicko2=1654.2|score2label=Survival|score2=88.13}} |
** Large improvement in PIF speed, at the cost of reduced wall-intersect checking. | ** Large improvement in PIF speed, at the cost of reduced wall-intersect checking. | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 19 September 2009
- Glacier Sub-pages:
- Glacier - Version History - GlacialHawk
- 1.3 - 19/9/2009
- Rating pending
- Fancy new experimental modeling of bullet-hit-probability at possible angles. Should work better than simply summing the movement profiles in the common 'shadow's melee gun' style. At least, it should once I get it tweaked...
- 1.2 - 18/9/2009
- MeleeRumble ‒ APS: 68.2% (7th), PL: 278-6 (6th), Survival: 88.13%
- Large improvement in PIF speed, at the cost of reduced wall-intersect checking.
- 1.1 - 10/9/2009
- MeleeRumble ‒ APS: 67.72% (5th), PL: 276-5 (5th), Survival: 87.82%
- Increase bullet power notably, to mostly follow HawkOnFire bulletpower formula
- Huge SlowBot and skips occasional turns. Will try to fix in 1.2 :(
- 1.0 - 9/9/2009
- MeleeRumble ‒ APS: 67.48% (5th), PL: 275-6 (6th), Survival: 91%
- Movement of HawkOnFire (from here) with Hypothermia (the gun of Glacier).
- Thoughts: Seems to be scoring how I expected: Above DiamondHawk but below ShadowHawk. But considering this gun was only given a single test run before release and no tuning at all, this is probably quite a good rating. Higher survival score than ShadowHawk indicates that bulletpower could be increased to trade a little survival for score, which doesn't surprise me given that the bulletpower selection is a complete 2-second hack without any real thought or tuning.
