Keeping AdvancedRobot instance in static field

From RoboWiki
Fragment of a discussion from Talk:Robocode
Jump to: navigation, search

I think the risk is that the static robot reference is not guaranteed to be valid after a given round, so if you don’t update the reference things may not work as expected.

Enamel 32 (talk)14:32, 19 August 2018

I think the risk is that the static robot reference is not guaranteed to be valid after a given round, so if you don’t update the reference things may not work as expected.

Xor (talk)01:43, 20 August 2018

I think the risk is that the static robot reference is not guaranteed to be valid after a given round, so if you don’t update the reference things may not work as expected.

Skilgannon (talk)18:38, 20 August 2018

I think the risk is that the static robot reference is not guaranteed to be valid after a given round, so if you don’t update the reference things may not work as expected.

Enamel 32 (talk)20:41, 20 August 2018
 

I think the risk is that the static robot reference is not guaranteed to be valid after a given round, so if you don’t update the reference things may not work as expected.

Xor (talk)02:31, 21 August 2018
 
 
 
Personal tools