Comparing GoTo Surfing with True Surfing?

Jump to navigation Jump to search

It might be causing you to skip turns. Goto surfing does a lot more calculations in a single tick.

Otherwise I would say it is a bug, maybe with the starting conditions of your second wave surfing. Most difficult to get right for me was aligning the time I switch to surfing second wave with when I actually stop surfing the first wave in my real movement.

Skilgannon (talk)‎14:06, 1 September 2017

I would say it's perfectly aligned, from the debug graphics the predicted next wave path is exactly the same as when it really happens.

However, I create a billion of new objects per surf ;p for every predicted new position, every stop status, etc.

But I never ever skipped a turn on my computer :( whereas I see a lot of very low score on the literumble which I can never reproduce on my computer.

May be I should eliminate all the object allocation in loops ;( I used to thought Java would use stack allocation for those objects after escape analysis (which is available since Java 6 update 14), but it doesn't.

Xor (talk)‎05:16, 2 September 2017

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:Wave Surfing/GoTo Surfing/Comparing GoTo Surfing and True Surfing?/reply (14).

 
 
Retrieved from "http://robowiki.net/wiki/Thread:Talk:Wave_Surfing/GoTo_Surfing/Comparing_GoTo_Surfing_and_True_Surfing%3F/reply_(2)#Comparing_GoTo_Surfing_with_True_Surfing.3F_5518"