Rumble Server

Fragment of a discussion from User talk:Bnorm
Jump to navigation Jump to search

LiteRumble has full pairings (and is stabilizing quicker due to my more aggressive priority battles), I've been keeping track of my progress there =)

Skilgannon17:14, 23 July 2012

Neat! I definitely need to start working on my KNN ProblemBots - that's the killer feature of LiteRumble for me right now. =) I'd also like to see what it's like to setup a separate instance of it, too.

The bot/version comparison is a must have feature for me in normal RoboRumble usage, though. I spend more time looking at those than actual rankings.

Voidious17:34, 23 July 2012

I was planning to do that this week, but got distracted by somebody making very nice progress in 1v1.

Skilgannon19:40, 23 July 2012

Hmm, that's quite a disparity for Diamond 1.8.1 between the two servers: 89.93 @ 2300 battles vs 89.76 @ 1400 battles. Maybe after the score comparison for bots/versions, we need a comparison between servers. =)

Voidious03:11, 24 July 2012

Yeah, I was noticing that. It could be due to the vs clients. I could whip up something simple similar to Darkcanuck's QueryAPI, although obviously it would have a few less fields.

Skilgannon09:21, 24 July 2012

Haha, ok, I was mostly kidding about the cross-server comparison app. =) 0.17 isn't that far beyond what I'd consider possible margin of error, and we've already established a few bots are acting differently in But on that note, your full-pairing RR server running on may prove to be a great way to figure out which bots are having issues.

Voidious15:00, 24 July 2012