Shooting Curve Flatteners

Jump to navigation Jump to search

There is a problem with this approach. Typically, you have about 10 sectors to shoot (if we divide guess factor range, by the bot body). Good curve flattener could be anywhere in a random fashion, even in just visited sector. So at best you increased your chances to 1/9 vs 1/10, in practice it is still 1/10. I have a random gun among list of available ones form my bots, often it gives the best result against curve flatteners. Sometimes, antiguess factor would lead you in wrong direction: I think DrussGT avoids GF=0, but with negative weight for visited spots, you soon will fire at GF=0 only, and unavoidably lose.

My strategy just fire randomly in this case, at least you get a chance to hit.

Beaming (talk)03:48, 5 August 2017

Actually you can increase the chance of hitting by firing when the robot is near a wall.

Dsekercioglu (talk)19:15, 5 August 2017
 

You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reasons:

  • The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users.
  • You must confirm your email address before editing pages. Please set and validate your email address through your user preferences.

You can view and copy the source of this page.

Return to Thread:Talk:Curve flattening/Shooting Curve Flatteners/reply (7).

You are right. I just tried a weighted random gun with reverse weights and it didn't do better than the anti-surfer gun.

Dsekercioglu (talk)15:58, 6 August 2017